Google no longer uses or updates Octane, due to it becoming less useful for measuring real-life performance, so keep that in mind when looking at the results:Īgain, there's not much variation between all three browsers. measures how many web features the given browser supports, and Octane 2.0 is a popular JavaScript benchmark.
I also ran two benchmarks on all three browsers. Considering both Lightning and Jelly use the same WebView engine, this shouldn't be much of a surprise. Performance was pretty close across all three browsers, with Lightning and Jelly nearly identical in performance and Opera Mini following closely behind. Take a look at how each browser performed: When choosing a browser for low-end devices, webpage loading times are incredibly important. I was going to use my ancient Samsung Galaxy Player 5.0, but I was unable to get a stable Android 6.0 ROM running. For my testing, I used Opera Mini (with all data savings options turned off), Lightning Browser 4.4.2, and a Jelly build compiled from source on May 6, 2017. Lightning and Jelly were both using Chromium WebView 58.Īll testing was performed on a Lenovo TB3-850F, which is the slowest Android device I own that can run all three browsers. Now it's time to see how well each browser works. You'll need Android 6.0 or higher to use it. I hope the Lineage project will upload Jelly to the Play Store or F-Droid in the near future, but for now, you can grab it from APKMirror. I tried lowering the minimum version to Android 5.1 before I compiled it, so I could try it out on my Moto G, but attempting to open the settings page would crash the app. The other potential problem is compatibility - it only works on Android 6.0 or higher, so you may not be able to run it on your older devices. Right now, it's not on the Play Store, but comes only as part of LineageOS on select devices. Unfortunately, Jelly has two major downsides. Jelly doesn't have a tablet interface - at least not yet.
0 kommentar(er)
